🔗 Share this article

Australia's controversial policy to restrict social platforms access for those under 16 is sparking debate worldwide. Politicians, safety advocates, and parents are watching intently to see if this strategy will inspire imitation for the rest of the world.

The European Trend

Throughout Europe, a rising group of countries are exploring comparable restrictions.

• Denmark has stated a prohibition on social media for youth below 15, with the PM stating that smartphones and networks are "taking away our children's youth". A law could be enacted next year.
• Norway is preparing to enforce a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to shield children from the "influence of the AI".
• The Irish government is developing a digital ID system to verify the age and identity of social media users. The media minister have stated that an Australian-model ban remains "one of the options under consideration".
• In The Spanish government, the prime minister has urged lawmakers to enact a law raising the access age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has floated the idea of a ban for those under fifteen, and a parliamentary commission has recommended a related action, alongside an overnight "internet blackout" for older teenagers.
• The administration in the Netherlands has advised parents to prevent their youngsters from social media until 15.

For the broader EU, the bloc's legislature has passed a symbolic resolution supporting a ban for teenagers under 16 except if a parent decides otherwise is given. While it cautions of the "habit-forming" design of these platforms, the resolution does not enact enforceable legislation.

"An effective age restriction is a good foundation," said the European lawmaker supporting the measure.

The UK: An Evidence-Based Approach

Across Britain, the government has not ruled out a possible ban, arguing that "no measure is off the table" but maintaining any policy must be "grounded in strong research".

Earlier, support gathered behind a proposal to impose limits on social media use by under-16s, but it was ultimately weakened. Nonetheless, the administration committed to further research the issue.

Advocacy groups have raised warnings. An organization established by the family of a young person who died after encountering harmful platform posts argues that a simple age ban could fail to make platforms safer and could result in a "cliff edge" of risk when young people turn 16.

"This ban is a reaction to the failure of the tech sector to build products and services that are secure and suitable for young users," commented a prominent peer.

The United States: A State-by-State Landscape

Stateside, action is mostly occurring at the local level amid federal stalemate.

• Utah demands guardian permission for minors to use social media and controls overnight use.
• Florida has passed a measure barring those below 14 from joining social media, though it faces court battles.
• Virginia has enacted a law restricting teenagers to 60 minutes of social media time per day, with extra time requiring adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly enacted laws mandating guardian approval for minors to open social media presences.

Despite widespread concern and calls from some politicians to follow the Australian lead, a US-wide ban is currently seen as unlikely.

Global Views

Outside of these regions, other nations are similarly exploring options.

• The Malaysian government intends to ban social media for teenagers beginning next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has increased the minimum age for the platform Instagram to 16.

Yet, world agencies strike a more measured position. Unicef has cautioned that age-based restrictions pose dangers and "could have unintended consequences". The agency notes that the internet can be a "vital connection" for isolated young people and that regulation should not be a "substitute" for tech companies to prioritize child safeguards.

As this global discussion unfolds, the steps of the Australian government and several other countries show that policymakers globally are increasingly prepared to wait for tech companies to make changes on their own.